Re: [RFC] Upstreaming virtio-wayland (or an alternative)

[Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>]

  Hi,

> But let's say we go for a dedicated virtio-device to preserve this
> granularity. Should we aim at providing a generic virtio-msg device or
> should we keep this so-called wayland-specific virtio device (I'd like
> to remind you that it's actually protocol-agnostic)?

I think it totally makes sense to have something protocol-agnostic,
especially given that people figured it isn't really wayland-specific
and already using the existing implementation for non-wayland things.

cheers,
  Gerd