[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH V2 2/2] virtio: introduce STOP status bit
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 09:38:55AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > å 2021/7/15 äå12:22, Max Gurtovoy åé: > > > > On 7/14/2021 6:07 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > It requires much more works than the simple virtqueue interface: > > > > (the main > > > > issues is that the function is not self-contained in a single function) > > > > > > > > 1) how to interact with the existing device status state machine? > > > > 2) how to make it work in a nested environment? > > > > 3) how to migrate the PF? > > > > 4) do we need to allow more control other than just stop/freeze > > > > the device > > > > in the admin virtqueue? If yes, how to handle the concurrent > > > > access from PF > > > > and VF? > > > > 5) how it is expected to work with non-PCI virtio device? > > > I guess your device splitting proposal addresses some of these things? > > > > > > Max probably has the most to say about these points. > > > > > > If you want more input I can try to answer too, but I personally am not > > > developing devices that need this right now, so I might not be the best > > > person to propose solutions. > > > > I think we mentioned this in the past and agreed that the only common > > entity between my solution for virtio VF migration to this proposal is > > the new admin control queue. > > > > I can prepare some draft for this. > > > > In our solution the PF will manage migration process for it's VFs using > > the PF admin queue. PF is not migratable. > > > That limits the use cases. > > > > > > I don't know who is using nested environments in production so don't > > know if it worth talking about that. > > > There should be plenty users for the nested case. > > > > > > But, if you would like to implement it for testing, no problem. The VF > > in level n, probably seen as PF in level n+1. So it can manage the > > migration process for its nested VFs. > > > The PF dependency makes the design almost impossible to be used in a nested > environment. Can't we have an emulated PF? This would be the most reasonable thing to do. > > > > > For question 5) what non-PCI devices are interesting in live migration ? > > > > Why not? Virtio support transport other than PCI (CCW, MMIO). > > Thanks >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]