[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: fix virtqueues accounting
On Thu, Jul 22 2021, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21 2021, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote: > >> Virtqueue index is zero based, thus virtqueue (N-1) refers to requestqN. >> >> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> >> --- >> content.tex | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> > > We had an issue for a similar fix for virtio-net, so do we want to use > issue+voting here as well, or would that be overkill? I'm inclined to do > this as an editorial update. I just went ahead and pushed it as an editorial update. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]