[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] virtio: i2c: Allow zero-length transactions
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:52:31AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 31-08-21, 20:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > But if you are doing it like this, then I think we should > > have conformance clauses that require that the flag > > is consistent with the buffer. > > Something like this will work ? > > diff --git a/virtio-i2c.tex b/virtio-i2c.tex > index ae344b2bc822..c7335372a8bb 100644 > --- a/virtio-i2c.tex > +++ b/virtio-i2c.tex > @@ -145,6 +145,12 @@ \subsubsection{Device Operation: Operation Status}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C > A driver MUST NOT use \field{buf}, for a read request, if the final > \field{status} returned from the device is VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR. > > +A driver MUST set the \field{VIRTIO_I2C_FLAGS_M_RD} flag for a read operation, > +where the buffer is write-only for the device. > + > +A driver MUST NOT set the \field{VIRTIO_I2C_FLAGS_M_RD} flag for a write > +operation, where the buffer is read-only for the device. > + > A driver MUST queue the requests in order if multiple requests are going to > be sent at a time. > > -- > viresh Something like this, yes. -- MST
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]