[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: introduce STOP status bit
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 05:41:27PM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:21 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:00:20PM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:17 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 08:58:05PM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:00 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:58:12PM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote: > > > > > > > +the driver MAY change avail_idx in the case of split virtqueue, but the new > > > > > > > +avail_idx MUST be within used_idx and used_idx plus virtqueue size. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how this would work. Available buffers may be > > > > > > consumed out-of-order unless VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER was negotiated, so the > > > > > > avail ring could contain something like: > > > > > > > > > > > > avail.ring = [Used, Not used, Used, Not used, ...] > > > > > > ^--- avail.idx > > > > > > > > > > > > There are num_not_used = avail.idx - used.idx requests that are "Not > > > > > > used" in avail.ring. > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean the driver can rewind avail.idx by counting the number of > > > > > > "Not used" buffers and skipping "Used" buffers until it reaches > > > > > > num_not_used "Not used" buffers? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to also drop the "resume" part for the next version because > > > > > it adds extra complexity not actually needed, and it can be achieved > > > > > with a full reset in a simpler way. > > > > > > > > > > But I'll explain it below with your examples. Long story short, the > > > > > driver only can rewind the available descriptors that are still in the > > > > > available ring, and the device must flush the ones that cannot recover > > > > > from the ring. > > > > > > > > > > > I think there is a known issue with this approach: > > > > > > > > > > > > Imagine a vring with 4 elements: > > > > > > > > > > > > avail.ring = [0, 1, 2, 3 ] > > > > > > Not used, used, used, used > > > > > > ^--- avail.idx > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the device has used 3 buffers the driver now has space to make > > > > > > more buffers available. avail.idx wraps back to the start of the ring > > > > > > and the driver overwrites the first element ("Not used"): > > > > > > > > > > > > avail.ring = [1, N/A, N/A, N/A] > > > > > > Not used, N/A, N/A, N/A > > > > > > ^--- avail.idx > > > > > > > > > > > > Since vring descriptor 0 is still in use the driver chose descriptor 1 > > > > > > for the new available buffer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now we stop the device, knowing there are two buffers available that > > > > > > have not been used. But avail.ring[] actually only contains the new > > > > > > buffer (vring descriptor 1) that we made available because we overwrote > > > > > > the old avail.ring[] element (vring descriptor 0). > > > > > > > > > > > > What now? Where does the device reset its internal avail_idx to? > > > > > > > > > > To be on the same page, in qemu the device maintains two "internal > > > > > avail idx": shadow_avail_idx (last seen in the available ring, could > > > > > be 4 in this case) and last_avail_idx (next descriptor to fetch from > > > > > avail, 2). The device must forget shadow_avail_idx and flush the > > > > > descriptors that cannot recover (0). So last_avail_idx is now 3. Now > > > > > it can stop. > > > > > > > > > > The proposal allows the device to fail descriptor 0 in a > > > > > device-specific way, but I think now it was a bad choice. > > > > > > > > > > The driver cannot move the device's last_avail_idx in this operation: > > > > > The device is simply forced to flush used ones to the used ring or > > > > > descriptor ring in a packed vq case. So the device's internal > > > > > avail_idx == used_idx == 3. When the device resumes, it's still 3. > > > > > > > > > > The device must keep its last_avail_idx through stop and resume cycle. > > > > > > > > Are you saying that all buffers avail->ring[i % ring_size] must be > > > > completed by the device before the STOP bit is reported where i <= > > > > last_avail_idx? > > > > > > > > This means the driver can modify avail->ring[i % ring_size] where > > > > avail_idx >= i > used_idx. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, That's correct. The driver could also decide to modify the > > > descriptor table instead of the avail ring to do so, but I think the > > > point is clear now. > > > > > > Somehow it is thought after the premise that the out of order > > > > "Somehow it is thought after the premise" == "there is a fundamental > > design assumption"? > > > > Well, there always are design assumptions :). I didn't see it as > fundamental at the time of sending it, when I didn't consider > "idempotents in-flight descriptors" as something I could take for > granted. So I thought of it as the best we could do with the backend > that must wait for them, and without introducing other complicated > things (in-flight). > > > > descriptors are descriptors that the device must wait to complete > > > before the pause anyway. Depending on the device, it might prefer to > > > cancel them, to wait for them, etc. The interesting descriptors to > > > rewind are the ones that have not reached the device (i > used_idx). > > > The driver can do whatever it wants with them. > > > > > > If we assume all the in-flight descriptors are idempotent and we > > > expose a way for the device to expose them, the model is way more > > > simpler than this. > > > > The constraint that the device has to mark all previously seen "avail" > > buffers as "used" is problematic. It makes STOP visible to the driver > > when the device has to fail requests. That is incompatible with how > > devices behave across live migration today. If you want to use STOP for > > live migration then it's probably necessary to rethink this constraint. > > > > QEMU's virtio-blk and virtio-scsi device models put failed requests onto > > a list so they can be retried after problems with the underlying storage > > have been resolved (e.g. more disk space becomes available and ENOSPC > > requests can be retried). Based on the constraints you described, those > > requests cannot be kept in the list across STOP. > > > > I didn't know about that, thanks for the information! Can vhost ones > do the same? No, there is no vhost-blk upstream and vhost-scsi doesn't migrate failed requests. > > QEMU live migration sends the retry list to the migration destination. I > > think you're saying that won't be possible when STOP is used to > > implement live migration? > > > > Without out of order descriptor usage, the device can simply not mark > them as used, and the destination will re-try them. Would that work? The failed requests feature is not useful with VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER since a failed requests prevents further I/O processing. > In the case of out or order, this proposal does not cover it 100% but > the next one will do. Great, looking forward to the next revision. Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]