Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add virtio Admin Virtqueue specification

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:04:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Exactly, another call for the using the PRS queue instead. But generally
> speaking, admin virtqueue limit or complicate the functions that can be
> exported to guest. That's why I suggest to decouple all the possible
> features out of admin virtqueue, and make it available by both the admin
> virtqueue and the transport specific method (e.g capability).

I'm not exactly sure what's wrong with starting with a queue, if there's
need to also allow passing that over another transport we can add that.
In particular, I think it's useful to have a capability to inject
requests as if they have been passed through a VQ.
Such a capability would address this need, won't it?

-- 
MST