Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add virtio Admin Virtqueue specification

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 04:47:10PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> I agree, I don't see why it's not possible to use a different command opcode
> for vf interrupt configuration and sf interrupt configuration.
> 
> We're not short in opcodes and it's very elegant and extendable IMO.
> 
> I think the order should be:
> 
> 1. add adminq to virtio spec with one simple example (say MSIX config for
> VFs)
> 
> 2. in parallel submission for admin commands: S-IOV support, num VQs config,
> feature bits config and more...

Up to you for sure but didn't you guys try this already?  I think there
are concerns such as how this will be extended to support subfunctions.
I can't say what do you want to do about that in v2, ignoring them
completely is probably not a good way to get more support in the TC.
Just my two cents, hope this helps.

-- 
MST