RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] Add virtio Admin Virtqueue

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 8:11 PM
> 
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:39:15AM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > +Regardless of device offering VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER, admin queue command
> > +buffers are used by the device in out of order manner.
> 
> Instead of special-casing AQ I'd like to see a generic capability addressing this
> need. For example, TX for virtio net might benefit from this too. And I'd like to
> mention, again, VIRTIO_F_PARTIAL_ORDER proposal as one, arguably cleaner
> and more generic way to address this.
> And if that's not adequate I'd like to address that as part of the
> PARTIAL_ORDER proposal, this kind of per-queue in order was definitely on
> the radar as it was formulated.
As we dropped other less important items from this proposal because it was too big.
I am going to keep the PARTIAL_ORDER also out of this one. It falls in same bucket.

So AQ follows same ordering rules as other queues.
Are you ok with this in v3?