[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] packed-ring.tex: link conformance statements
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:11:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Link conformance statements into conformance chapter. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > --- > > conformance.tex | 9 +++++++++ > > packed-ring.tex | 16 +++++----------- > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex > > index 9807c30..663e7c3 100644 > > --- a/conformance.tex > > +++ b/conformance.tex > > @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets} > > \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Available Buffer Notification Suppression} > > \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating idx} > > \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Notifying The Device} > > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues} > > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / PAcked Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table} > > I wonder whether we could use the opportunity to fix that "PAcked" typo > here as well. It's just a ref but if you like it, sure, make it a patch on top. > > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Scatter-Gather Support} > > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table / Indirect Descriptors} > > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating flags} > > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Sending Available Buffer Notifications} > > \item \ref{drivernormative:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Initialization} > > \item \ref{drivernormative:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Cleanup} > > \item \ref{drivernormative:Reserved Feature Bits} > > @@ -340,6 +346,9 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets} > > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Used Buffer Notification Suppression} > > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Used Ring} > > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Available Buffer Notification Suppression} > > +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues} > > +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table} > > +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Scatter-Gather Support} > > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Shared Memory Regions} > > \item \ref{devicenormative:Reserved Feature Bits} > > \end{itemize} > > I guess it is ok to link this up as an editorial update; the statements > are pre-existing, and an implementation that does not know the feature > bit remains compliant. I agree. -- MST
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]