OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets


> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 12:05 PM
> 
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:00:08PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >
> > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 5:03 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we make this depend on the vq reset ability maybe?
> > > >
> > > > The advantage of this is to keep TX working. Or we can use device
> > > > reset as a fallback if there's no vq reset.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Device reset is really annoying in that it loses all the state:
> > > rx filters etc etc.
> >
> > The elegant solution is let driver tell the new mtu to the device.
> > One way to do so is by using existing ctrl vq.
> 
> That will need a new feature bit.
> 
Yes. ctrl vq can tell what all configuration does it allow. :)
Or you prefer feature bit?

> > If merged buffer is done, and new mtu is > minimum posting size, no need
> to undergo vq reset.
> > If merged buffer is not done, and buffer posted are smaller than new mtu,
> undergo vq reset optionally.
> 
> This can be done with or without sending mtu to device.
Yes, telling mtu to device helps device to optimize and adhere to the spec line " The device MUST NOT pass received packets that exceed mtu" in section 5.1.4.1.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]