OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH 0/2] introduce virtio-ism: internal shared memory device


On 18.10.22 09:32, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 17.10.22 09:47, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> # Background
>>
>> Nowadays, there is a common scenario to accelerate communication between
>> different VMs and containers, including light weight virtual machine based
>> containers. One way to achieve this is to colocate them on the same host.
>> However, the performance of inter-VM communication through network stack is not
>> optimal and may also waste extra CPU cycles. This scenario has been discussed
>> many times, but still no generic solution available [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> With pci-ivshmem + SMC(Shared Memory Communications: [4]) based PoC[5],
>> We found that by changing the communication channel between VMs from TCP to SMC
>> with shared memory, we can achieve superior performance for a common
>> socket-based application[5]:
>>   - latency reduced by about 50%
>>   - throughput increased by about 300%
>>   - CPU consumption reduced by about 50%
>>
>> Since there is no particularly suitable shared memory management solution
>> matches the need for SMC(See ## Comparison with existing technology), and virtio
>> is the standard for communication in the virtualization world, we want to
>> implement a virtio-ism device based on virtio, which can support on-demand
>> memory sharing across VMs, containers or VM-container. To match the needs of SMC,
>> the virtio-ism device need to support:
>>
>> 1. Dynamic provision: shared memory regions are dynamically allocated and
>>    provisioned.
>> 2. Multi-region management: the shared memory is divided into regions,
>>    and a peer may allocate one or more regions from the same shared memory
>>    device.
>> 3. Permission control: The permission of each region can be set seperately.
>>
>> # Virtio ism device
>>
>> ISM devices provide the ability to share memory between different guests on a
>> host. A guest's memory got from ism device can be shared with multiple peers at
>> the same time. This shared relationship can be dynamically created and released.
>>
>> The shared memory obtained from the device is divided into multiple ism regions
>> for share. ISM device provides a mechanism to notify other ism region referrers
>> of content update events.
>>
>> # Usage (SMC as example)
>>
>> Maybe there is one of possible use cases:
>>
>> 1. SMC calls the interface ism_alloc_region() of the ism driver to return the
>>    location of a memory region in the PCI space and a token.
>> 2. The ism driver mmap the memory region and return to SMC with the token
>> 3. SMC passes the token to the connected peer
>> 3. the peer calls the ism driver interface ism_attach_region(token) to
>>    get the location of the PCI space of the shared memory
>>
>>
>> # About hot plugging of the ism device
>>
>>    Hot plugging of devices is a heavier, possibly failed, time-consuming, and
>>    less scalable operation. So, we don't plan to support it for now.
>>
>> # Comparison with existing technology
>>
>> ## ivshmem or ivshmem 2.0 of Qemu
>>
>>    1. ivshmem 1.0 is a large piece of memory that can be seen by all devices that
>>    use this VM, so the security is not enough.
>>
>>    2. ivshmem 2.0 is a shared memory belonging to a VM that can be read-only by all
>>    other VMs that use the ivshmem 2.0 shared memory device, which also does not
>>    meet our needs in terms of security.
> 
> This is addressed by establishing separate links between VMs (modeled
> with separate devices). That is a trade-off between simplicity of the
> model and convenience, for sure.

BTW, simplicity can also brings security because it reduces the trusted
code base.

Another feature of ivshmem-v2 is permitting direct access to essential
resources of the device from /unprivileged/ userspace, including to the
event triggering registers. Is your model designed for that as well? It
not only permits VM-to-VM, it actually makes app-to-app (in VMs) very cheap.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]