[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PROPOSAL] Virtio Over Fabrics(TCP/RDMA)
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 11:40:02AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 7:31âPM zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com> wrote: > > I develop an kernel initiator(unstable, WIP version, currently TCP/RDMA > > supported): > > https://github.com/pizhenwei/linux/tree/virtio-of-github > > A quick glance at the code told me it's a mediation layer that convert > descriptors in the vring to the fabric specific packet. This is the > vDPA way. > > If we agree virtio of fabic is useful, we need invent facilities to > allow building packet directly without bothering the virtqueue (the > API is layout independent anyhow). I agree. vrings makes sense for RDMA, but I think virtio_fabrics.c should not be dependent on vrings. Linux struct virtqueue is independent of vrings but the implementation currently lives in virtio_ring.c because there has never been a non-vring transport before. It would be nice to implement virtqueue_add_sgs() specifically for virtio_tcp.c without the use of vrings. Is a new struct virtqueue_ops needed with with .add_sgs() and related callbacks? Luckily the <linux/virtio.h> API already supports this abstraction and changes to existing device drivers should be unnecessary or minimal. Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]