[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH 1/5] introduction: tweak text as suggested by pbonzini
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:19:27PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > Seems slightly more straight-forward. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > --- > > introduction.tex | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex > > index cf2fdac..7c79921 100644 > > --- a/introduction.tex > > +++ b/introduction.tex > > @@ -20,14 +20,14 @@ inter-guest communication) requires copying. > > > > Standard: Virtio makes no assumptions about the environment in which > > it operates, beyond supporting the bus to which the device is > > - attached. Virtio > > + attached. In this specification, Virtio > > devices are implemented over MMIO, Channel I/O and PCI bus > > transports > > \footnote{The Linux implementation further separates the virtio > > transport code from the specific virtio drivers: these drivers are shared > > between different transports. > > }, earlier drafts > > - have been implemented on other buses not included in this specification. > > + have been implemented on other buses not included here. > > Hmm, I would normally just apply this as trivial, but it intersects > with other feedback which hasn't been applied yet. > > Instead I appended it to feedback/5.txt, which appears as shown below. > > Thanks, > Rusty. I have to say patches in version control seem very inconvenient, they make me confused. Why don't we push things out to git and use that for review? I pushed out mine here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/virtio-text.git tags/for_review -- MST
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]