Re: [virtio] [PATCH] VIRTIO-60: vring*, VRING_* and virtio_ring used for virtqueue without explanation

[Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>]

Paul Mundt <Paul.Mundt@huawei.com> writes:
> Add some clarification to the head of the virtqueue section outlining
> how the vring/virtio_ring terminology is used throughout the
> specification.

Here's an alternative, which simply uses consistent naming.

This is slightly cleaner of course, but is a bit of a pain for those
used to the legacy names.  So it needs addition of the legacy sections
mentioning that, but I'll wait until MST merges his stuff into master.

MST?

Thanks,
Rusty.