First of all, best wishes to you and your family. I still recall the excitement when my daughter was born!
We noted that the TeX was voted as authoritative. If that is the case then you'll need to add the TeX directory to the This version and Latest version links and - is there a master driver file from which all the others are processed or assembled? I never did work with TeX but assuming there is, that I suppose would be the file to point to. You'll also have to take the (Authoritative) designation off the PDF files.
My wife went into labor on Friday morning, so things are a bit
hectic here. Michael, can you please organise this?
We had voted to make the TeX source authoritative for this version, BTW.
Thanks,
Rusty.
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:15:13PM -0400, Chet Ensign wrote:
>> Members of the VIRTIO TC,
>>
>> We are working on your Committee Spec Draft and public review for the 2nd csprd
>> for VIRTIO (https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-1638 and /
>> tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-1641).
>>
>> In working on these, we have encountered some items that need to be fixed. As
>> you produce the documents, we ask that you make these and send us an updated
>> set of zip files. Here is what we need:
>>
>> 1) cover page changes needed for csd02
>>
>> - This version:
>>
>> -- both tex and pdf are listed as authoritative. obviously 2 versions can’t be
>> authoritative. since pdf has been authoritative before, it seems best to stay
>> with that but regardless, please indicate one authoritative source (Latest,
>> Previous, This)
>>
>> -- assuming PDF is labelled authoritative, remove /tex directory. It is
>> indicated in the Additional artifacts section below
>>
>> - Previous version:
>> -- Change links to
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/csprd01/virtio-v1.0-csprd01.pdf
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/csprd01/virtio-v1.0-csprd01.html
>>
>> -- Label the PDF version (Authoritative)
>>
>> - Latest version:
>> -- Label the PDF version (Authoritative)
>>
>> - Editors:
>> -- Pawel’s link under ARM goes to a download page not to the company page.
>> Should be changed to http://www.arm.com
>>
>> - Citation format:
>> We updated our citation model a few months ago to include the editors and the
>> Latest version link. Please update the citation block to read:
>>
>> [VIRTIO-v1.0]
>>
>> <italics>Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) Version 1.0</>. Edited by Michael S.
>> Tsirkin, Cornelia Huck, and Pawel Moll. 11 March 2014. OASIS Committee
>> Specification Draft 02. http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/csd02/
>> virtio-v1.0-csd02.html. Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/
>> virtio/v1.0/virtio-v1.0.html.
>>
>> *Note that “OASIS” is also added before “Committee Specification Draft 02” for
>> the csd and before "Committee Specification Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 02"
>> for the csprd.
>>
>> - Notices:
>> Set copyright year to 2014
>>
>> - In PDF, for footer:
>> Set copyright year to 2014.
>>
>> 2) cover page changes needed for csprd02:
>>
>> - Same changes as for the csd02 files.
>>
>> -- Plus: The ZIP file contains all the individual html files for the footnotes,
>> but they are not needed. They should be removed. I think the TC removed them
>> in the csd02 files, but not in the csprd02 files. (csprd02 footnotes work fine
>> without the files - the footnotes are embedded and linked in the main .html
>> file.)
>>
>> -- We need a red-lined DIFF file in PDF between csprd02 and csprd01 that
>> displays the changes. We point out this to reviewers in order to limit the
>> public review comments to only those that changed.
>
> Due to the huge number of formatting and text movement changes, we ended
> up with almost all of the file red-lined. On the TC, we voted to
> produce csprd02 and csd02 without this DIFF and start producing DIFF
> files from version 03.
>
> I hope this is acceptable.
>
>> 3) We need a comment resolution log from the TC for comments received in
>> csprd01
>
> I actually wrote a script to append the resolution changelog as last
> part of the file, but this was done after csd02/csprd02 were approved.
> Do you think appending the log is an acceptable change to make
> without re-doing the voting?
>
>> Thanks - if you can send me those files when they are ready, I'll update the
>> ticket and we will continue to process the spec.
>>
>> Thanks & best,
>>
>> /chet
>
> I'll work on this shortly - unless Rusty already started?
>
>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> /chet
>> ----------------
>> Chet Ensign
>> Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
>> http://www.oasis-open.org
>>
>> Primary: +1 973-996-2298
>> Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
>>
>> Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at http://
>> www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/
>> tc-admin-submission-checklist.html
>>
>> TC Administration information and support is available at http://
>> www.oasis-open.org/resources/tcadmin
>>
>> Follow OASIS on:
>> LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/OASISopen
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/OASISopen
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/oasis.open
--
/chet ---------------- Chet Ensign Director of Standards Development and TC Administration OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society http://www.oasis-open.org