Re: [virtio] virtio 1.0 errata

[Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:12:03 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> ok we have a somewhat major issue with
> incorrect ring size listed in the table:
> VIRTIO-120
> 
> this seems to warrant errata release,
> and we can fix the ugly ldots: VIRTIO-115

I agree that we want an errata release for these.

> 
> anything else that's small and urgent enough that it can and should go
> in errata?

The (mostly cosmetic) section alignment for virtio-block (VIRTIO-125) I
just posted is certainly small, but I don't think I'd classify it as
urgent.