Re: [virtio] voting and issue tracking for virtio 1.0cs03/1.1

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:52:23 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:21:28AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:44:41 +0200
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > We will also need some process to periodically approve
> > > > post-factum formatting, typo fixes and similar simple changes.
> > > > We don't want issue tracking for these I think.
> > > > I'll probably put these up for voting about once
> > > > a month or so, we'll see.
> > > 
> > > Should we perhaps have an issue that is collecting all those minor
> > > fixes and is simply opened after month?
> > > 
> > > > All this likely will mean there will be a bunch of ballots
> > > > running on the TC at all times.
> > > > If you can't vote, pls remember to mark up your status
> > > > as leave of absence.
> > > 
> > > After having searched on the oasis site for a while: Remind me how one
> > > does so?
> > > 
> > > > Cornelia, could you please start with CCW patches you posted so we can
> > > > try this out, see how well it works?
> > > 
> > > That would be 116-119 and 129, right? I can give it a try later.
> > 
> > I can do the technicalies if it's hard for you, but
> > I need to know which are bugfixes intended for 1.0-cs03 and
> > which are features for 1.1 only.
> 
> OK, changed 116/118/119/127. Don't remember the reporter though (ISTR
> it was me).

I think so. Pls fill it.
Do you think 116 is non material?


> 117 is not ready yet (no proposed change). I think we also
> need to handle 125, don't we?

why not, that's easy.

> Please let me know how I messed up :)