[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: planning virtio 1.1: should latest version be updated?
> > We added a sentence in the Status section of the cover pages pointing readers
> > to the Technical Work section of the TC's web page for any subsequent work
> > products.
>
> We don't have that ATM. Is there an example showing how that
> can look?
Chet, could you answer this one please?
I would like to have a link to the TC homepage in the next
release.
Where should I put it? Should I remember "latest version"
to "latest 1.0 version" to make the distinction clear?
> > I realize that's not perfect but we don't put pointers in that jump
> > across the trees.
> >
> > /chet
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Chet, all,
> >
> > We started getting patches destined for virtio 1.1.
> >
> > I noticed that virtio spec versions include the following links:
> >
> > Latest version:
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/virtio-v1.0.pdf
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/virtio-v1.0.html
> >
> > However, eventually (after we release virtio 1.1), we will probably
> > want to stop maintaining virtio 1.0 branch.
> >
> > Would it be possible to place the latest version here instead:
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1/virtio-v1.pdf
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1/virtio-v1.html
> >
> > and additionally have the v1.0 versions redirect there
> > (for people that click links in the old released spec versions)?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > MST
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > /chet
> > ----------------
> > Chet Ensign
> > Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
> > OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
> > http://www.oasis-open.org
> >
> > Primary: +1 973-996-2298
> > Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]