Re: virtio 1.0 cs03

[Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>]

On (Sun) 19 Jul 2015 [15:22:32], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Hi Amit,
> You asked:
> 	No discussion on VIRTIO-144 (re-adding VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH and
> 	VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE­)? It is a regression, so we should have them
> 	back for v1.0
> 
> The ballot has this text:
> 
> 	The TC agrees to defer fixing known open issues to a future version of
> 	the specification. List of deferred changes:
> 
> 	virtio-blk: restore VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH and VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE
> 	https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio/201507/msg00049.html
> 
> So this is in fact addressed.
> 
> So the proposa is that we release cs03 as is,
> and then work on cs04 brining flush/wce back.
> 
> It's not a regression in the sense that cs01 and cs02 lack
> these features too, so releasing cs03 as is we are not making things
> worse, and there are a bunch of fixes in cs03 already.

Right - if this is scheduled for sc04, I'm fine with that.  I'll
change my vote, thanks.


		Amit