Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ccw: be more precise the semantic of revision 1

[Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 02/12/2018 01:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri,  9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100
> Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> s/precise/precise about/

Nod. Should I spin a v2 or is it better handled
via fixup by maintainer?

> 
>> Revision 1 of the CCW transport is currently defined as virtio 1.0. This
>> could become confusing when we bump the version of the virtio
>> specification to 1.1, in a sense that it could be interpreted like one
>> can not use any features not part of the 1.0 specification.
>>
>> So let us try to avoid confusion regarding the semantic of virtio-ccw
>> revision 1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  content.tex |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
>> index c7ef7fd..86044dd 100644
>> --- a/content.tex
>> +++ b/content.tex
>> @@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ The following values are supported:
>>  \hline \hline
>>  0        & 0      & <empty>   & legacy interface; transitional devices only \\
>>  \hline
>> -1        & 0      & <empty>   & Virtio 1.0 \\
>> +1        & 0      & <empty>   & Virtio 1 \\
>>  \hline
>>  2        & 0      & <empty>   & CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS support \\
>>  \hline
> 
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

Thanks!

> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>