Re: [virtio] [PATCH 0/5] fixes and tweaks for virtio v1.1

[Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>]

I've decided not send a v1 until the fate of the notifications
series gets deiced (so I can hopefully base these on those). So,
some more time for comments.

Regards,
Halil


On 04/20/2018 05:00 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> ping
>
> Some of the patches received feedback suggesting changes are to
> be pursued. Some patches did not receive any.
>
> I would prefer having at least a 'the right direction'/'seems wrong' type
> of feedback for each patch before sending a non RFC with the requests
> made here addressed.
>
> On 04/09/2018 08:58 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > Some of these are more and some are less important. Please
> > be careful, there is always a chance that I misunderstood something
> > and that I'm trying to change for the worse.
> >
> > I've identified some other weak point's too, but tried to
> > proceed in order the more grave and the better I think I
> > understand it (and thus propose a fix) the higher the priority.
> >
> > Some stuff I've left for my notifiers patch set. This one
> > and that one will have to get merged if both turn out to
> > be good.
> >
> > Halil Pasic (5):
> >    packed-ring: fix used descriptors but meant buffers
> >    consistency: clean up stale  wording for v1.1 terms
> >    packed-packed: fix supplying buffers description
> >    packed-ring: reposition drivernormative on driver notifications
> >    packed-ring: tweak driver code example
> >
> >   content.tex     |   14 ++++----
> >   packed-ring.tex |   96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >   2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)