OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] rework notifications terminology




On 08/02/2018 12:30 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:


On 07/27/2018 01:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:33:15PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:


On 07/17/2018 06:47 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:

OKÂIÂseeÂthereÂareÂacksÂalreadyÂ-ÂdoÂyouÂwantÂtoÂstartÂvotingÂonÂthis?




Yes,ÂvotingÂwouldÂmakeÂsenseÂinÂmyÂopinion.



I'veÂsubmittedÂaÂgithubÂissue.ÂPleaseÂletÂmeÂknowÂifÂfurtherÂactionsÂare
required.


ping

ping

Oh, sorry, I wasn't clear.
What you want to do is
1. post the patches including
Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/16
in the commit log part.
2. proposal must link to oasis archive, not mail-archive.

Anyway, I fixed the link and started voting now.


Should post a v4 (or a 'REPOST v3') with the r-b's received for
v3 and the 'Fixes' tags? I mean the ballot, would not link to the
final thread then. I'm a bit confused regarding now, but I
think I understood the process.

I think you are right since ballot started no need for v4.


Thanks!

FYI I'm on and off starting tomorrow till 5th September. I
am very likely to make any ballots though, but longer response
times and lower availability are to be expected.

Thanks,
Halil

What are we going to do about crypto proposals? I think we do want to
finalize a draft for public review by september, and it seems
very unfortunate not to have that device in the draft at all.


As I wrote in the other thread I'm fine either way. But I don't
think I will be able to muster the time and go trough he spec
and the code by September. I have a couple of weeks of vacation
in August, but I intend to stay tuned.

Given the whole situation, I have the feeling merging the thing
even if it's a bit 'on risk' seems to be the most reasonable option.
I often tend to regard standards as 'holy cow that is cast in
stone'. That makes me over-cautious. If something needs to be
fixed, we can fix it when the need becomes apparent.

Best regards,
Halil



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]