[OASIS Issue Tracker] (VIRTIO-167) Confusing "non-Transitional" conformance statement

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Chet Ensign updated VIRTIO-167:
-------------------------------
              Project: OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC  (was: Technical Advisory Board)
                  Key: VIRTIO-167  (was: TAB-1672)
          Component/s:     (was: Public reviews)
    Affects Version/s:     (was: Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) Version 1.1)

> Confusing "non-Transitional" conformance statement
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VIRTIO-167
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-167
>             Project: OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: Conformance
>            Reporter: Jacques Durand
>            Priority: Major
>
> We read in 7.4:
> "A non-transitional implementation conforms to this specification if it satisfies all of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements defined above. "
> Is that true? ALL the "MUST" in all previous sections? Probably not. Or maybe it is "below" and not "above". (always explicitly refer to requirements sets by using a sub-section number & name)
> I suggest to make "transitional" just a variable (i.e. a parameter) in previous top-level conf clauses. (see TAB conformance guideline [http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCHandbook/ConformanceGuidelines.html, section 5.5)Â|http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCHandbook/ConformanceGuidelines.html)]E.g. someone claiming conformance as "PCI driver" should always clarify: "transitional PCI driver" or "non-transitional PCI driver"



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.7.2#77003)