[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (VIRTIO-167) Confusing "non-Transitional" conformance statement
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael S. Tsirkin updated VIRTIO-167: -------------------------------------- Proposal: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio/201903/msg00022.html (was: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio/201903/msg00013.html) > Confusing "non-Transitional" conformance statement > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: VIRTIO-167 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-167 > Project: OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: virtio 1.0 cs04 > Environment: Conformance > Reporter: Jacques Durand > Priority: Major > Fix For: virtio 1.1 cs01 > > > We read in 7.4: > "A non-transitional implementation conforms to this specification if it satisfies all of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements defined above. " > Is that true? ALL the "MUST" in all previous sections? Probably not. Or maybe it is "below" and not "above". (always explicitly refer to requirements sets by using a sub-section number & name) > I suggest to make "transitional" just a variable (i.e. a parameter) in previous top-level conf clauses. (see TAB conformance guideline [http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCHandbook/ConformanceGuidelines.html, section 5.5)Â|http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCHandbook/ConformanceGuidelines.html)]E.g. someone claiming conformance as "PCI driver" should always clarify: "transitional PCI driver" or "non-transitional PCI driver" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.2#77003)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]