Re: [PATCH v10 06/10] mmio: document ADMIN_VQ as reserved

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 06:40:55PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Did you miss reviewed-by from [1] or this is an old series reposted?
> [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202302/msg00242.html

As a general rule, we don't strictly need to track reviewed by since
there's a ballot (and presumably people review before voting).

People also tack on Signed-off-by: (and I do it too) but
as long as we don't document what it means it's kind of vague,
and the process of subscribing to the mailing list is
a kind of replacement.

If you think everyone needs to follow practices like netdev does,
we really need something written up, and agree on it.

E.g.  I work on the linux kernel too, so I can copy practices from
there, but even linux isn't uniform.

And I wonder whether it's worth it - it definitely makes
contributing to Linux harder, and even within Linux it pushes
contributors away. At least for Linux tracking history
in a precise way is extremely important since it's helpful
with stability. Spec is very different.

Until we have a good contribution documentation I think we should not
ask people to follow a pseudo linux work flow with requests like "please
split this patchset up" or "track changes across patch versions"
simply because there's no good docs to teach people what exactly is
the best practice.

-- 
MST