[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio] [PATCH v10 04/10] admin: introduce virtio admin virtqueues
Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:25:32PM CET, parav@nvidia.com wrote: > >> From: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-comment@lists.oasis- >> open.org> On Behalf Of David Edmondson > >> In support of live migration, might we end up moving large amounts of device >> state through the admin queue? >> >Correct. > >> If so, that would seem to have some performance requirements, though I don't >> know if it would justify multiple admin queues. >DMA of the data through the proposed AQ is supported. > >If I understood Max correctly when Max said " This AQ is not aimed for performance ", >he means that AQ doesn't have performance requirements as io/network queues to complete millions of ops/sec. > >it is several hundred to maybe (on the higher side) thousand ops/sec during LM, provisioning use case. But isn't it good to design it for performance from start? I mean, state transfer of thousands of VFs at a time is definitelly performance related, isn't it? > >DMA perspective as you mentioned, AQ still has the same perf requirements as that of regular nw/blk io queues.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]