Doug and all:
I will still schedule for this Thu 18, noon. Doug: IBM can still have some representation with Tom Link?
However I will not schedule the CSD vote this Thu, as Doug is the only IBM voting member: we’ll do an electronic ballot instead soon after (hopefully).
Because next week is not good for a few of us either (CMWG F2F) so that would otherwise delay at least 2 more weeks.
Agenda for this Thu 18:
1. Review of the first drafts for the 4 profiles. Watch for coming update fleshing out the Conformance Clauses.
2. Anything more to do before putting these as first CSDs via electronic ballot ? (Committee Specification Drafts)
3. Treatment of Test Assertions: Review of the proposed XML adjunct files, and see Test appendix in core CSDs candidates.
4. Follow-up on the proposal to process the tools separately (donate to an OSS project) yet to retain authority on conformance criteria in the TC.
Thanks,
-jacques
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:32 PM
To: Jacques Durand
Cc: ws-brsp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-brsp] Tentative BRSP meeting Thu, April 18, noonPT
I'll be at the openstack summit that week.
thanks
-Doug
________________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Jacques Durand ---04/05/2013 09:11:14 PM---Let me know in advance if you cannot make that time. Draft agenda:
From: Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
To: "ws-brsp@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-brsp@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Date: 04/05/2013 09:11 PM
Subject: [ws-brsp] Tentative BRSP meeting Thu, April 18, noonPT
Sent by: <ws-brsp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Let me know in advance if you cannot make that time.
Draft agenda:
1. Review of the first drafts for the 4 profiles. Watch for coming update fleshing out the Conformance Clauses.
2. Tentative approval as first CSDs (Committee Specification Drafts) for the TC
3. Treatment of Test Assertions: Review of the proposed XML adjunct files, and appendix in core CSDs.
4. Follow-up on the proposal to process the tools separately (donate to an OSS project) yet to retain authority on conformance criteria in the TC.
Thanks,
-jacques