a quick summary of my own review on BP1.2 comments

[Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>]

Summary of my own review of BP1.2 (sorry should have posted it earlier this week):

-          The reviewer has categorized comments as minor / major / critical / blocker. We need to answer properly the “major / critical / blocker”

-          A short list of the major comment types:

1.       General packaging : should all profiles be a single Work product (single spec)? (TAB-400)

2.       Confusion about Test Assertions status: normative/not? (TAB-265)

3.       Confusion about Appendix status: normative/not? (TAB-302)

4.       Confusion about some examples status: normative/not? (TAB-290)

5.       Conformance Claim mechanism itself: normative or not? (TAB-278)

6.       References and citations need major clean-up, some need be updated? (TAB-165, TAB-222, TAB-167, TAB-155, TAB-301)

7.       HTML validation issues (TAB-120)

8.       Normative scope of content: only the Rxxx or more? (TAB-267)

-jacques