[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] issues 1-7 in draft doc
I'm happy with ResponseHandler and I don't think we need to put this up for a re-vote: it's an editorial decision IMO. Mark. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> To: "ws-caf-editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 2:21 AM Subject: [ws-caf-editors] issues 1-7 in draft doc > Gentlemen, resolving issues 1-6 in the WS-Context specification was > scandalously easy: there were no changes to the text. However, issue 7 > is bothering me. The correct spelling is indeed Respondent. However, > these porttypes are for receiving responses. Respondent is defined, in > the American Heritage dictionary as "one who responds". I mentioned this > to Martin, but not Mark (duh!) before the TC kicked off, and then > completely forgot about it. So I suggest that we come up with a more > appropriate term, like ResponseHandler. Any objections? > > On a related topic: following Monday, I propose we integrate the model > directly into the text, start to make sure we have the outline for the > structure of the text that we deem appropriate, and plan what sequence > diagrams are required to describe interactions. Since we're aiming for a > draft to be ready before the next TC, we've got some busy weeks ahead. > > Greg > >
Simeon M. Greene Senior Member of Technical Staff 224 Strawbridge Drive Suite 300 Moorestown NJ 08057 USA p. (856)914-4757 f. (856)914-4742 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]