[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-caf-editors] next rev model
Yes, I don't think we have to justify it. We discussed it at the Paris F2F and my understanding of the consensus there is that pass-by-value is a helpful option. Choreology was the only objecting voice. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:32 AM To: Greg Pavlik; ws-caf-editors Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] next rev model OK. I find it strange to have to justify the pass-by-value aspect of context, since it's the most fundamental version. We added pass-by-reference afterwards because it looked useful as well. Mark. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> To: "ws-caf-editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:09 AM Subject: [ws-caf-editors] next rev model > Gentlemen -- another draft that attempts to answer Peter's questions as > well as reflect what I think was the consensus outcome of the > discussions we had. It's clear that some folks are going to challenge > us sharply on the utility of "pass by value" (what I consider to be the > normal model for simple transaction protocols) as well as the need for > exposing nesting relationships in the context structure; actually > Peter's latest email suggests that the whole idea of context should be > discarded altogether in favor of SOAP headers. So.... > > Here's a short list of TODOs. Please feel free to create a better list > or, should we stick with this, swap TODOs. Can we > > 1) make sure that this is an accurate synopsis of our shared > understanding? (Mark/Eric) > 2) buttress it with some examples (Eric) > 3) take a stab at building up the defenses from the likely objections > (why nesting structures are useful to expose in the context; what > contexts have in common at the most basic level that needn't be > reinvented continuously in every protocol that uses SOAP headers, why > pass by value is useful, etc.) (Mark) > > It would be great if we could have feedback from everyone by tomorrow > afternoon. > > Thanks. > > Greg >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]