Hmmm, sounds like a fairly significant change to
the structure of the document, which will make it difficult to the other members
of the TC to track, even given revision bars. And it'll make merging a nightmare
:-( Or isn't it as major as it sounds?
Mark.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:05
PM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] release of
new draft prior to f2f
ok, I'm guessing that we may be a day or two late. I'm working
on a fold in + restructuring of the model, after which I really need you to go
over it with a fine tooth comb. The problem I have is that the current
organization is centered on the activity model, whereas we want to exploit the
fact that the complete architecture is progressively decomposable. As it
stands, for example, I found it impossible to talk about the Context without
reference to activity models, for example. And I wanted to address the
redudancies and forward references in the document. I'm on a clarity
bender.
So I'm trying to say something about (in
order):
Overview Architecture Context (without reference to
activities) Activities Context Service Context Manager Activity
Lifecycle Service
folding in the model change where appropriate. My
current target to send you guys something is Friday, but I have had three days
of meetings that are running to 10pm on a different time zone. So I have not
made the progress I would have liked.
Greg
Mark Little
wrote:
Did we say that we would release a new draft of
Context a week prior to the f2f in New Orleans? If that's the case, then I'd
like to have all the updates to merge by this Friday if
possible.
Mark.
|