[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] Issues remaining
We may need to vote on closing issue 59 though. Mark. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> To: "ws-caf-editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:28 PM Subject: [ws-caf-editors] Issues remaining > I reviewed the bug db and the minutes from the F2F. > > I believe I have to work out issues 59 and 91. My feeling is that issue > 59 is now defunct -- the sequence diagram was mainly intended to capture > the interaction between the Context Service and the Activity Lifecycle > Service. I am working on text for 91; in addition, I am going to > incorporate the addressing proposal we approved at the meeting, and > improve on the example as per Bryan's suggestion. Depending on > commitments I have at home, I may be able to do this tonight. > > On open items remains: to capture the logical request-response exchange > in tabular form to provide normative rules for callback messaging; this > is actually quite important because it allows us to express a complex > message exchange pattern without reference to a specific message > addressing scheme. WS-MD supports this scenario, while WS-Addressing > does not to my knowledge. The issue was raised by Peter. Any takers on this? > > I wanted to make you guys -- and this is more for the chairs then for > the editors -- that WS-Reliability is adopting our open content proposal > for message addressing/service references. We may want to make this an > agenda item on Monday. > > Greg > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]