RE: [ws-caf-editors] Issues remaining

[Mark Little <Mark.Little@arjuna.com>]

OK, I didn't check, so you could be right.

Mark.

>===== Original Message From Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> =====
>It seems to have been resolved by previous votes, but that's fine with me.
>
>Mark Little wrote:
>
>>We may need to vote on closing issue 59 though.
>>
>>Mark.
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
>>To: "ws-caf-editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:28 PM
>>Subject: [ws-caf-editors] Issues remaining
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I reviewed the bug db and the minutes from the F2F.
>>>
>>>I believe I have to work out issues 59 and 91. My feeling is that issue
>>>59 is now defunct -- the sequence diagram was mainly intended to capture
>>>the interaction between the Context Service and the Activity Lifecycle
>>>Service. I am working on text for 91; in addition, I am going to
>>>incorporate the addressing proposal we approved at the meeting, and
>>>improve on the example as per Bryan's suggestion. Depending on
>>>commitments I have at home, I may be able to do this tonight.
>>>
>>>On open items remains: to capture the logical request-response exchange
>>>in tabular form to provide normative rules for callback messaging; this
>>>is actually quite important because it allows us to express a complex
>>>message exchange pattern without reference to a specific message
>>>addressing scheme. WS-MD supports this scenario, while WS-Addressing
>>>does not to my knowledge. The issue was raised by Peter. Any takers on
>>>
>>>
>>this?
>>
>>
>>>I wanted to make you guys -- and this is more for the chairs then for
>>>the editors -- that WS-Reliability is adopting our open content proposal
>>>for message addressing/service references. We may want to make this an
>>>agenda item on Monday.
>>>
>>>Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>