Subject: RE: [ws-caf-editors] context spec?
You're right, I didn't use Mark's version... Maybe we should just go with that at this point? My apologies. -----Original Message----- From: Greg Pavlik [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 3:45 PM To: Mark Little Cc: Newcomer, Eric; ws-caf editors Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] context spec? There is one other problem: Eric's changes were made against the 5-20 version not the 5-26 version of the editor's draft. If I recall properly, the 5-26 version includes changes/comments from Mark. I recall what, if any, changes I made in that version. Greg Mark Little wrote: >Thanks. I'll have to take a closer look tonight, but I'm not sure some of the changes make things clearer. I think it could be a case of maybe needed to expand some more. > >Mark. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Newcomer, Eric > To: Mark Little ; ws-caf editors > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 6:53 AM > Subject: RE: [ws-caf-editors] context spec? > > > Here is the update with my comments included - two versions attached, one with redlines and the other without. > > Eric > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Little [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 6:24 AM > To: ws-caf editors > Subject: [ws-caf-editors] context spec? > > > Apologies for being out of the loop for the past week, but vacation time and other stuff has had me tied up. So, where are we with regard to the progress of the document? > > Mark. > > ---- > Mark Little, > Chief Architect, Transactions, > Arjuna Technologies Ltd. > > www.arjuna.com > > > >