Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context

[Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>]

read on... I believe it was released and announced ;-)
greg

Martin Chapman wrote:

>whats the plans for pushing a copy to the group?
>We really need something out ASAP.
> 
>Martin.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Newcomer, Eric [mailto:Eric.Newcomer@iona.com] 
>Sent: 15 June 2004 03:18
>To: Greg Pavlik
>Cc: Mark Little; ws-caf-editors
>Subject: RE: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>
>
>Here's the spec with the additional edits/comments beyond those that
>Mark already caught.  Many of them are editorial and "spec-ese" kinds of
>clarifications for consistency of wording etc.  
> 
>I think the concerns in the comments are around whether or not
>WS-Context can stand on its own (referencing specs are mentioned in a
>couple of places as if they are required) and some remaining fuzziness
>about the definition of an Activity and its relationship to context and
>the context service.
> 
>Let me know if anyone wants to talk on the phone about anything, we can
>use my call number.
> 
>Eric
> 
> 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Greg Pavlik [mailto:greg.pavlik@oracle.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:36 AM
>To: Newcomer, Eric
>Cc: Mark Little; ws-caf-editors
>Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>
>
>sounds good
>
>Newcomer, Eric wrote:
>
>
>Right - the activity exists but I just want the text to be clear that we
>don't create it, only the context for it...  Does that make sense?
>
> 
>
>Unfortunately I left my marked up copy at home.  Will it be ok to send
>the changes this evening, or is that too late?
>
> 
>
>Eric
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From: Greg Pavlik [mailto:greg.pavlik@oracle.com]
>
>Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:35 AM
>
>To: Newcomer, Eric
>
>Cc: Mark Little; ws-caf-editors
>
>Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>
>
>
>
>
>If the activity is the execution, then no, we don't manage it. On the
>other hand, what is this context thingy before we start to do any
>operations?
>
>
>
>Newcomer, Eric wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>I had started making a few changes also.  Perhaps the best thing for me
>to do is start over with this version.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Everything I spotted was editorial except for one thing, which was a
>statement that we were managing activities.  I have seen this also in
>Microsoft material.  The difficulty is that we are calling activity an
>abstract notion for which we are managing context.  I do not think we
>create or manage the activity itself, do we?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I'll get the rest input as soon as I can.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>
>
>From: Mark Little [ mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
>
>
>
>Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:27 AM
>
>
>
>To: Greg Pavlik; ws-caf-editors
>
>
>
>Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Comments in line. I accepted all of the changes and then made some more.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Mark.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>
>
>From: "Greg Pavlik"    <mailto:greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
><mailto:greg.pavlik@oracle.com>  <mailto:greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
><greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
>
>
>
>To: "ws-caf-editors"    <mailto:ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
><mailto:ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
><mailto:ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
><ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
>
>
>
>Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:36 PM
>
>
>
>Subject: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>Gentlemen,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>This is the latest revision for the proposed committee draft. I urge you
>
>
>
>to read it carefully with the change bars turned off; please be
>
>
>
>especially diligent in looking for errors.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Mark, WSDL+Schema on the way for packaging things up for the TC to
>review.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>We're getting close. Thanks to everyone for their hard work.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Greg
>
>
>
>    
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>