Re: [ws-caf-editors] issue 139

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

I think Peter is saying that someone implementing a spec. that requires
WS-Context need not implement all of WS-Context. It's a bit like
implementing WS-AtomicTransaction now, which requires WS-Addressing: you
don't need to implement all of WS-Addressing in order to have a compliant
implementation of WS-AtomicTransaction.

I don't think it's a major issue though.

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Cc: "ws-caf editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] issue 139


> I thought this was already clear; the spec states that it may be
> decomposed to include only those aspects relevant to the problem domain.
>
> Mark Little wrote:
>
> >If you check out 139
(http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=139) I'd say that
Peter's last paragraph is an editorial change.
> >
> >Mark.
> >
> >----
> >Mark Little,
> >Chief Architect, Transactions,
> >Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
> >
> >www.arjuna.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>