Re: [ws-caf-editors] issue 135

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

I think the idea was they were a more lightweight list of services in the
activity, which may actually be a non-overlapping set of participants in a
CF sense.

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Cc: "ws-caf editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] issue 135


> yes, but it does beg the question of how these will differ from
> participants in the CF sense of the term.
>
> Mark Little wrote:
>
> >My take on http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=135 is
that the list has always been services that have/are taking part in the
activity. If we're agreed, then it's just a minor editorial change.
> >
> >Mark.
> >
> >----
> >Mark Little,
> >Chief Architect, Transactions,
> >Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
> >
> >www.arjuna.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>