[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] issues to work on
I thought 91 was considered irrelevant since the SOAP endpoint is the only mechanism for dereferencing contexts. Is there any ambiguity on that? This was, I believe, discussed at the F2F also. The minutes, however, do not explicity mention 91. Greg Mark Little wrote: >Does anyone remember what the actual resolution for http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=142 was? The minutes weren't clear. > >Greg: > >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=129 >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=130 >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=134 > >can you double check http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91 > >Mark: all of Bryan Murray's > >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=131 >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=132 >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=133 >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=136 > >Eric: > >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=135 (Simeon will update the schema if you can check the document text). >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=139 (not sure what was agreed at the f2f). >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=140 (Simeon will do the schema if you can check the text) > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]