RE: [ws-caf-editors] issues to work on

["Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>]

On 142, I believe the following motion passed:

 

"change the type of context service from any type to a service reference Type"

 

Attached are the changes for the issues on my list.  For 139 I added a brief paragraph to the front of the spec to describe the "referencing specification" ability to choose what optional elements of WS-Context to use.  We may need more text than that, assuming it seems like a good way to handle it.  Otherwise I don't think we are yet at the stage where we're ready to write about conformance, and I also don't think we can say that a referencing spec can make a required WS-Context syntax element optional.

 

Eric

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:41 AM
To: ws-caf editors
Subject: [ws-caf-editors] issues to work on

Does anyone remember what the actual resolution for http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=142 was? The minutes weren't clear.

 

Greg:

 

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=129

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=130

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=134

 

can you double check http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91

 

Mark: all of Bryan Murray's

 

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=131

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=132

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=133

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=136

 

Eric:

 

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=135 (Simeon will update the schema if you can check the document text).

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=139 (not sure what was agreed at the f2f).

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=140 (Simeon will do the schema if you can check the text)

 

WSCTX-Eric.doc