[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] issues to complete
why don't you just dole out assingments. I'd be happy turn resolutions back to you by Monday. Greg Mark Little wrote: >Looks to me like we have the following work items to address between ourselves: > >Issue 141 (http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=141), and the last minutes say: >"Action 1: Editors to clarify the implications of, and the differences in propagating, updating and >dereferencing contexts by value or by reference." I'll take a stab at this unless someone else really wants to. > >Also: "Eric suggested adding an example of the use of WS-Addressing as well as of WS MessageDelivery >now that WS-Addressing had been submitted to the W3C. >Martin said he was happy if someone could do it. . Eric said he would volunteer but has computer problems present and is on vacation." > >Martin, any progress on: "Action 3: Martin to provide a list of things to be covered (plus actual text if possible). " > >Guy pointed out an issue: "Guy: In section 3 the context schema contains ServiceRefType for ‘context-service’ element >whereas the following text mentions URI. Does the third section, second bullet of >description under Figure 4 apply to a previous version? It mentions URI rather than ServiceReferenceType." > >which I've fixed. > >"Martin section 2.2 talks about the relationship to WSDL. Clarify that WSDL 1.1 must be supported." Any progress? > >Simeon, can you update the namespace in the schema? > >Mark. > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]