Re: [ws-caf-editors] issues to complete

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

I did. Each issue has names against it (including yours) ;-)

Mark.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Cc: "ws-caf editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Simeon Greene"
<simeon.m.greene@oracle.com>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] issues to complete


> why don't you just dole out assingments. I'd be happy turn resolutions
> back to you by Monday.
>
> Greg
>
> Mark Little wrote:
>
> >Looks to me like we have the following work items to address between
ourselves:
> >
> >Issue 141 (http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=141),
and the last minutes say:
> >"Action 1: Editors to clarify the implications of, and the differences in
propagating, updating and
> >dereferencing contexts by value or by reference." I'll take a stab at
this unless someone else really wants to.
> >
> >Also: "Eric suggested adding an example of the use of WS-Addressing as
well as of WS MessageDelivery
> >now that WS-Addressing had been submitted to the W3C.
> >Martin said he was happy if someone could do it.  . Eric said he would
volunteer but has computer problems present and is on vacation."
> >
> >Martin, any progress on: "Action 3: Martin to provide a list of things to
be covered (plus actual text if possible). "
> >
> >Guy pointed out an issue: "Guy: In section 3 the context schema contains
ServiceRefType for ‘context-service’ element
> >whereas the following text mentions URI.  Does the third section, second
bullet of
> >description under Figure 4 apply to a previous version?  It mentions URI
rather than ServiceReferenceType."
> >
> >which I've fixed.
> >
> >"Martin section 2.2 talks about the relationship to WSDL.  Clarify that
WSDL 1.1 must be supported." Any progress?
> >
> >Simeon, can you update the namespace in the schema?
> >
> >Mark.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>