Re: [ws-caf-editors] WSCTX Namespace

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

Agreed.

Mark.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>; "Simeon Greene"
<simeon.m.greene@oracle.com>; "ws-caf editors"
<ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf-editors] WSCTX Namespace


> A single namespace should be ok for us.  It doesn't need the .wsdl
qualifier.  If we wanted two separate namespaces for WS-CTX we should define
them but I don't see that we need two.  A namespace is only a unique string
prefix, after all.  I realize some of the ones in use are dereferencable,
but there's no requirement for that.  We can have a separate URL for the
WSDL, that's fine, even if it's nearly the same as the namespace URI.
>
> Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 6:13 AM
> To: Simeon Greene; ws-caf editors
> Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] WSCTX Namespace
>
>
> I'd like to reach agreement on this before I release the next draft.
>
> I thought that the namespace was
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/wscaf/2004/09/wsctx
>
> Many specifications have a separation of schema from WSDL. Take the
> WS-Atomic Transaction spec. for instance. There's wsat.wsdl and wsat.xsd,
> but the namespace is http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/09/wsat
>
> Mark.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simeon Greene" <simeon.m.greene@oracle.com>
> To: "ws-caf editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:43 PM
> Subject: [ws-caf-editors] WSCTX Namespace
>
>
> > In section 1.1 of the spec It says:
> >
> > The XML namespace URI that MUST be used by implementations of this
> > specification is:
> >
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wscaf/2004/09/wsctx
> >
> > However this is only partially correct as there are two namespaces
> > associated with the Context spec.  There is
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wscaf/2004/09/wsctx.xsd, and
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wscaf/2004/09/wsctx.wsdl.  It might be
> > confusing to explain this, but we have a few choices:
> >
> > 1) Change the url to
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wscaf/2004/09/wsctx.wsdl.  This will be
> > assuming that "implementations of this specification" refers to wsdl.
> >
> > 2) Add http://docs.oasis-open.org/wscaf/2004/09/wsctx.xsd and explain
> > the difference between the two.
> >
> > 3) Change both the schema and wsdl definitions to use the same
namespace.
> >
> >
> > I will choose 1) for now and await comments from this group.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simeon
> >
>
>