[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-caf-editors] FW: Public Comment for Ws-Context
Well, Mark has the source... -----Original Message----- From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:40 AM To: 'ws-caf editors' Subject: [ws-caf-editors] FW: Public Comment for Ws-Context we must get the Context Draft updated to use the OASIS template before we can go to review: http://www.oasis-open.org/spectools/index.php who is up for such a wonderful job? -----Original Message----- From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org] Sent: 19 October 2004 15:35 To: Martin Chapman Cc: 'James Bryce Clark'; Eric.Newcomer@iona.com Subject: Re: Public Comment for Ws-Context Yes, all CDs must use the OASIS templates. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#committee_draft "The Committee Draft must use the OASIS-approved document templates and naming, and must include the OASIS copyright." -Karl Martin Chapman wrote: > is it compulsory to use the OASIS doc template, as just realised our > approved draft doesn’t use it! > > Martin. > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org] >>Sent: 19 October 2004 14:46 >>To: martin.chapman@oracle.com >>Cc: James Bryce Clark; Eric.Newcomer@iona.com >>Subject: Re: Public Comment for Ws-Context >> >> >>Martin: >> >>For a review to qualify as the public review required by the >>TC Process >>it must be announced by me to the members, etc. Please see the section >>"Public Review" at >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#committee_draft >> >>You'll need to provide me with the publicly-viewable URL for the spec, >>and the start/end dates of the review. Then I'll get the announcement >>out right away. >> >>See, for example, >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200410/msg00000.html >> >>-Karl >> >> >> >>James Bryce Clark wrote: >> >>> Martin & Eric: Thank you. Congratulations for reaching this >>>stage. We normally achieve a public review of a TC draft by >> >>having it >> >>>formally announced to the public review over our channels, >> >>including to >> >>>the members-announce lists. I am forwarding this to Karl >> >>for action. I >> >>>expect he will need, at least, a pointer to the specific uploaded >>>version that has been approved for review. JBC >>> >>>At 05:07 PM 10/18/2004, Martin Chapman wrote: >>> >>> >>>>jamie, >>>>at out last f2f, the ws-caf tc voted in favor of putting the >>>>ws-context v.7 cd out for public comment. do you know if there is a >>>>comment email setup for the caf group so that we can include this in >>>>the document. is there anything else we need to know that’s not >>>>already >>> >>in the tc >> >>>>process? >>>> >>>>cheers, >>>> martin. >>>>_________________________________________________________________ >>>>martin chapman >>>>consulting member of technical staff >>>>oracle >>>>p: +353 87 687 6654 >>>>e: martin.chapman@oracle.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]