[Bug 240] New: Anish editorial (1)

[bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com]

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=240

           Summary: Anish editorial (1)
           Product: WS-Context
           Version: 1.0
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Editorial
        AssignedTo: ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
        ReportedBy: mark.little@arjuna.com
         QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com


3) Section 1 (heading) is missing, the spec starts straight with 1.1
EDITORIAL

4) Appendix A should not be section 9?
EDITORIAL

5) In "Note on terminology" it says:
"Namespace URIs of the general form "some-URI" represents some application-
dependent or context-dependent URI as defined in RFC 2396 [3]."
Doug: is this editorial, or a proposal about the terminology.
Mark: it is just editoral
AGREED EDITORIAL (Replace "some-URI" with "http://example.org/..."; and 
http://example.com/...)
6) Section 1.1.1 Prefix Namespace table should be expanded to include the 
prefix "soapbind" and "soap" and an entry for wsrm referencing scheme.  Also 
the prefix "tns" has the namespace "targetNamespace.  The tns entry should be 
moved outside the table with an explanation since "targetNamespace" is not a 
namespace URI.
EDITORIAL

7) Section 2, line 2:
s/operations/interactions
EDITORIAL

9) Section 2.2, page 6 does not say anything about WSDL 2.0.  It would be good 
to separate WSDL 1.1 and 2.0.  The normative WSDL is indeed 1.1, but the 
wording in section 2.2 talks about WSDL generically.

Previous decision was to target WSDL 1.1. 
EDITORIAL CLARIFICATION/restatement



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.