[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 245] New: Anish editorial (3)
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=245 Summary: Anish editorial (3) Product: WS-Context Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Editorial AssignedTo: ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org ReportedBy: mark.little@arjuna.com QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com 28) section 3.1, page 10 says: "As mentioned earlier, ..." include a reference to the right section. EDITORIAL 29) section 3.1, page 10 says: "These semantics are indicated in a context by a protocol identifier representing the protocol type of the activity." add "by the ctx:type element" for clarity. EDITORIAL 30) page 11, 2nd paragraph leads me to believe that multiple ws-context SOAP header blocks are allowed in a SOAP env. Is that correct? EDITORIAL - yes multiple ctx are allowed, clarify 31) page 11, 3rd para: s/which may be/which may vary from EDITORIAL ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]