[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: fallout from New Orleans f2f
Apologies if this comes through more than one: I had trouble with my mail client. I'm going through the minutes from New Orleans and have the following AIs for people (please read to the end of the email to see ALL action items): Greg: Can you fold in issues 241, 244 and 246 to the latest draft? Also issue 235. Mark: 251, 208 Mark Little makes motion that all CF interfaces must be contextualized. Mark/Kevin: Fold in issue 249. Look at issue 233. Motion by Greg Pavlik recoverParticipant replaced by replaceParticipant. Motion seconded by Mark Little. comment four: Mark Little makes motion to replace recoverRegistration with replaceRegistration. Greg Pavlik seconds motion. Kevin: Issues 236, 257 Tony Fletcher makes motion to remove any element from CF Registration context. Mark Little seconds. AI implementation subgroup: should consider how ACID model can be incorporated into interop scenarios. Martin: Editorial action: insert text indicating that WSDL is normative over examples. AI for Martin to search minutes for instructions. Martin to check with Oracle's new Security Guru about why we sign context *and* context-id separately. ALL: Can everyone look at 257 because I'm not sure the minutes accurately reflect the discussion and subsequent issue. Also from the minutes: Tony notes that In Context schema, element assertion doesn't seem to be used. Greg Pavlik makes motion to remove assertion element. Tony This is definitely wrong if it's talking about Assertion as the base element for all messages. Wasn't it actually about StatusElementType? Fletcher seconds. AI for Kevin to remove. Mark.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]