OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-caf-implement message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan

Yes, that's what I thought and I don't think Oracle would be alone in this.
I'm also not sure whether any OASIS policies on privacy of TC work would
prevent such relatively public displays of code.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Simeon M Greene" <simeon.m.greene@oracle.com>
To: "John Fuller" <jfuller@wernervas.com>; "Mark Little"
Cc: <ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org>;
<ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org>; "malik saheb"
<malik.saheb@arjuna.com>; <krishna@inventicasystems.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:39 PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan

> Unfortunately, policies here at Oracle will prevent me from loading source
> code up on sourceforge.  Most likely I will have to keep my source code
> private until the legal department clears it for release.  Usually that
> happens after the code has reached some point of stability (like after the
> demos are completed).
> If we follow what the WS-I Sample Application Implementation group does,
> each company would develop their own implementation in private, but
> following a specification and testing against established test cases.  We
> however need a common repository for WSDL files, specs, test cases etc...
> Maybe we can use sourceforge/cvs for that.
> -Simeon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Fuller [mailto:jfuller@wernervas.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 7:38 AM
> To: Mark Little
> Cc: ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org;
> ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org; malik saheb;
> krishna@inventicasystems.com
> Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan
> I guess as my suggestion goes, I was imagining someone like Malik could
> set up a sourceforge project
> (and sourceforge.net would be the host) sort of like I did at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/easywsrm/
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/easyasap/
> and Jeffrey Ricker did at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/axisasap/
> and grant developers administrative permissions.
> It's free, public, you can move whatever you want into the file
> releases if you have administrative rights, etc.  So I could move in
> C++ for that package, others could move in their Java and we could also
> put our working documents out there.  It does support CVS, but you
> don't need to use it.
> ***
> Another alternative I suppose would be a yahoo group like boost C++
> uses for its files at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/
> This would make the work public just to those in the group.
> On Dec 17, 2003, at 2:25 AM, Mark Little wrote:
> > It's worth considering, but who'd host it?
> >
> > Also, are we actually going to provide a single demo implementation (or
> > implementations depending on the coding language) or just a
> > model/definition
> > that each individual member can code against? There are pros and cons
> > of
> > both approaches.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]