Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan

[Mark Little <Mark.Little@arjuna.com>]

I think this is all an important part of the discussion we are having.
However, as Simeon has already pointed out, there may well be restrictions
on what individual companies are allowed to contribute in terms of coding. I
also think that's putting the cart before the horse: we can't make a
decision about implementation until we have decided what we are trying to
implement. Let's discuss that first. I think Simeon's idea on this has
merit, but I haven't had a chance to read and digest it fully yet.

Mark.

----
Mark Little,
Chief Architect, Transactions,
Arjuna Technologies Ltd.

www.arjuna.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Krishna Cheemalamarri" <krishna@inventicasystems.com>
To: "'Mark Little'" <mark.little@arjuna.com>; "'John Fuller'"
<jfuller@wernervas.com>; "'malik saheb'" <malik.saheb@arjuna.com>
Cc: <ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan


> If we build a single demo implementation with couple of coding
> languages, won't we get a chance to test the interoperability also? I
> think it is worth a while testing especially Ws-Context and
> WS-Coordination with heterogeneous languages/platforms. As a second
> option, we can take one step at a time. I think that we need to put our
> options on the table and come to a collective decision.
>
> Cheers!
> Krishna
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:25 AM
> To: John Fuller; malik saheb
> Cc: krishna@inventicasystems.com;
> ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org;
> ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan
>
> It's worth considering, but who'd host it?
>
> Also, are we actually going to provide a single demo implementation (or
> implementations depending on the coding language) or just a
> model/definition
> that each individual member can code against? There are pros and cons of
> both approaches.
>
> Mark.
>
> ----
> Mark Little,
> Chief Architect, Transactions,
> Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
>
> www.arjuna.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Fuller" <jfuller@wernervas.com>
> To: "malik saheb" <malik.saheb@arjuna.com>
> Cc: <krishna@inventicasystems.com>;
> <ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org>;
> <ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan
>
>
> > how about an overarching sourceforge project then?
> >
> > On Dec 16, 2003, at 1:19 PM, malik saheb wrote:
> >
> > > The implementation plan will not be available before Christmas.
> > >
> > > The goal of this subcommittee is mainly; from different
> implementation
> > > we could provide an interoperable application as a proof of concept
> to
> > > promulgate the ws-caf specification, and not to produce a reference
> > > implementation.
> > >
> > > Some points to consider for the demo application are:
> > > - Do we consider only one single application that can be improved
> step
> > > by step (how ws-ctx is used, then ws-cf then ws-txm) or several
> > > applications according to what we want to demonstrate? I guess that
> the
> > > first case is more appropriate.
> > > Simeon is proposing a demo based on the "Supply Chain Management
> > > application" implemented by the WS-I Sample Apps Group.
> > > - According to the chosen application, we should think about the
> > > possible transactions model (or models) to use.
> > > - From the programming language point of view, no language is
> obviously
> > > mandated. We have listed Java and C++, any other language is
> welcome.
> > >
> > > Several implementations are expected so I don't think that a CVS
> access
> > > is appropriate, unless requested!!
> > >
> > > I guess that most you will take some holidays (as me) during this
> > > period, therefore it will be difficult to provide a plan for the
> next
> > > ws-caf con-call meeting (January 5th). May I ask everyone here on
> his
> > > availability for a con-call meeting, and then ask who could host the
> > > meeting call?
> > >
> > > Discussion on the mailing list is now open; it will be fine to make
> > > available our plan by mid-January.
> > >
> > > Malik SAHEB
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Krishna Cheemalamarri [mailto:krishna@inventicasystems.com]
> > > Sent: 16 December 2003 00:43
> > > To: ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Cc: ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan
> > >
> > > Hi Malik,
> > >
> > > Will the implementation plan be available before Christmas? If
> > > you can send me an outline of the plan, I can work on a detailed
> > > project
> > > plan and distribute it. Do you have any plans about setting up the
> CVS
> > > yet?
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > > Krishna
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>