OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-caf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference


Thus spoke Mark Little (mark.little@arjuna.com) on Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 10:10:42AM -0000:
> Pete, I think that there was an implied notion of allowing votes in
> meetings, but unless I missed it (entirely possible in that particular
> discussion) it wasn't said explicitly. If someone has a more accurate
> recollection then let me know.
> 
> One solution would be to replace "route" with "electronic route" in the
> minutes, to make explicit what was implicit.

That would resolve my concern with the wording.  Thanks!

--Pete

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Wenzel" <pete@seebeyond.com>
> To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
> Cc: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference
> 
> > > ...
> > <1> Jeff (Mischinsky) objected to email ballots and proposals of motions
> > > by email. Martin agreed.
> > >
> > <2> Eric then asked for clarification of exactly what the new motion
> > > should be, to which Jeff responded that Kavi should be the only route
> > > for voting within the TC.
> > >
> > > Pete (Wenzel?) seconded the motion.
> > >
> > > Eric asked if there was any further discussion or objections. Hearing
> > > none, the motion was carried.
> >
> > Seems like something is slightly amiss here, unless my memory is
> > failing.  I agree with <1> above, but think <2> may not be correct.
> >
> > If the restated motion is correct as recorded, we would be unable to
> > vote during meetings, and every little decision would be delayed for
> > a week.  My opinion is that at the chairs' discretion, a voice vote
> > during a meeting may be deemed appropriate for some matters, while
> > the Kavi route could be chosen for decisions that require further
> > thought or additional participation.  But definitely the intent was
> > to disallow email voting.
> >
> > --Pete
> > Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
> > Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
> > Standards & Product Strategy
> > +1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]