RE: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference

["Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>]

I'm sorry it wasn't more explicit, but my understanding was that the motion was addressing votes outside of meetings, not voting within meetings.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 5:11 AM
To: Pete Wenzel
Cc: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference


Pete, I think that there was an implied notion of allowing votes in
meetings, but unless I missed it (entirely possible in that particular
discussion) it wasn't said explicitly. If someone has a more accurate
recollection then let me know.

One solution would be to replace "route" with "electronic route" in the
minutes, to make explicit what was implicit.

Mark.

----
Mark Little,
Chief Architect, Transactions,
Arjuna Technologies Ltd.

www.arjuna.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Wenzel" <pete@seebeyond.com>
To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Cc: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference


> > ...
> <1> Jeff (Mischinsky) objected to email ballots and proposals of motions
> > by email. Martin agreed.
> >
> <2> Eric then asked for clarification of exactly what the new motion
> > should be, to which Jeff responded that Kavi should be the only route
> > for voting within the TC.
> >
> > Pete (Wenzel?) seconded the motion.
> >
> > Eric asked if there was any further discussion or objections. Hearing
> > none, the motion was carried.
>
> Seems like something is slightly amiss here, unless my memory is
> failing.  I agree with <1> above, but think <2> may not be correct.
>
> If the restated motion is correct as recorded, we would be unable to
> vote during meetings, and every little decision would be delayed for
> a week.  My opinion is that at the chairs' discretion, a voice vote
> during a meeting may be deemed appropriate for some matters, while
> the Kavi route could be chosen for decisions that require further
> thought or additional participation.  But definitely the intent was
> to disallow email voting.
>
> --Pete
> Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
> Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
> Standards & Product Strategy
> +1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)
>